The Race for the Presidency
Between Shayna's recent posts and an email from my sister, Bethany, I've done some thinking lately about how I'd rank the presidential candidates.
It'll come as no surprise to most people that Ron Paul is my favorite. He's the one candidate who really understands the Constitution and the proper limits of governmental authority. There was a fantastic moment in last night's debate where Paul (finally getting a word in edgewise) pointed out that, for all of the other candidate's talk about how they'd "manage the economy," the government's proper role is to make sure our currency has value and to get out of the way. He's the one Republican who was against the war in Iraq from the very beginning, and he's the one Republican who speaks sensibly about the fact that the terrorist threat is the result of our foreign policy, and we can't expect to end terrorism unless we are willing to change our policies. I disagree with Paul's thoughts on immigration, but on pretty much everything else he's a rockstar.
Among the other four candidates, Huckabee is my second choice. The guy is sharp, and a very effective communicator. I strongly oppose his stance on immigration and the "protection" of marriage, and I have massive reservations about some of his foreign policy stances, but he makes sense on health care, taxes, and I think he's likely to pick at least decent judges.
If one of those two isn't nominated, Obama would be my third choice. I don't think he has the faintest idea of how to pay for the massive social programs he's suggesting, and thus I don't think he has a very good grip on economic matters, but he's good on civil liberties issues, which are extremely important to me. Also extremely important is the fact that I think Obama is unlikely to embroil us in another foreign policy/military fiasco like Iraq.
A good step below these three (sorry, Shayna!) is John McCain. I respect his military service and I think he knows what's up, economically, but he pretty much sucks on civil liberties. Beyond that, he's a wild-card as far as foreign policy is concerned, and I could definitely see him continuing Bush's cowboy diplomacy.
And if the options are either Romney or Hillary? I'll write in Stephen Colbert. As I told Bethany, Romney is entirely too smarmy and oily. I don't think anyone could really predict what we would be getting with him as a president. And Hillary is the caboose of this train, mostly because I think people know precisely what they'd be getting with her as a president.
So that's my ranking of the candidates. Let me know what you folks are thinking!